User talk:Lotje

Discussion archives can be found here: User talk:Lotje/Archive (January 2021-recently). Archive 2020.

Automatische nummering van bronnen in categorie openingstekst

2024 05 24 Opzet van categorie tekst zoals beginnetjes op Wikipedia met genummerde bronnen specifiek aangegeven

Hoi Lotje, om te beginnen hartelijk dank voor je enorme inzet hier en ook voor deze bewerking, die ik net heb teruggedraaid. Ik stel het bijzonder op prijs, dat je meedenkt, inziet dat het voor verbetering vatbaar is, en daar naar handelt. In dit geval was er echter wat verloren gegaan, en eerlijk gezegd wil ik graag die lay-out nog even zo minimalistisch en strak houden.

Op Wikipedia zelf, en nu zeg ik het maar kort door de bocht, wordt op dit moment de representatie van Venlo weggevaagd. Er is voor een soort nucleaire optie gekozen om het in een keer in de as te leggen. Nu heb ik dat eerder meegemaakt, dat het overlegklimaat zo vergiftigd wordt dat daar geen normale opbouw meer mogelijk is. En eigenlijk zie ik dat nu weer gebeuren. Nu wil ik je daar natuurlijk niet mee belasten, maar we staan er allemaal bij en kijken ernaar.

Ik heb zes maanden terug de keuze gemaakt me te distantiëren van alle verwikkelingen op Wikipedia en op Commons aan de heropbouw te gaan werken. En hiervoor gebruik ik de opening van de categorie. Hierbij wens ik een duurzame wederopbouw te bewerkstelligen... en dat kan alleen maar als alle beweringen onderbouwd worden. En daarbij zit er in de categorieopbouw een automatische nummering. De beginnetjes die ik daarbij maak zijn vergelijkbaar met hoe het 20 jaar geleden ook is begonnen hier. Graag zou ik natuurlijk zien, dat dit op Wikipedia verder gaat maar ik heb daar een hard hoofd in.

Aanvullingen van de bronnen, zoals jij hebt aangevuld zijn natuurlijk van harte welkom. Maar ik zou je willen vragen, daar hier nog even mee te wachten. Dit alles is een beetje kort door de bocht, maar ik hoop dat je het een beetje vat. Alvast bedankt. -- Mdd (talk) 11:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Preslauer??

Beste Lotje, Wat ben je aan het doen met dit soort bestanden? Waar haal je Preslauer vandaan? Vysotsky (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Hallo Vysotsky, was het geen typo dan van de USMM zoals bij Albert Gemmeneker? Lotje (talk) 02:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Het stond er goed. Waarom zou je dat naar fout veranderen? Als een bron die fout geeft, meld je dat misschien als er twijfel is, maar niet als het overduidelijk incorrect is. Je linkt notabene zelf naar het juiste artikel. Vysotsky (talk) 10:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

In 't vervolg klop ik weer bij je aan. Lotje (talk) 12:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:CPE - C'est Pas Évident

Category:CPE - C'est Pas Évident is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Prototyperspective (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

uncategorized categories

There are some categories you created or last edited on Commons:Report_UncategorizedCategories_with_infobox (174). Is there are plan for these? Some don't even have any files in them (17). Ideally, when creating a category one adds one or several parent categories.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 19:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Ideally, when creating

• Category:Castrillejo de la olma

and then realizing that it should be

• Category:Castrillejo de la Olma

you would add {{Speedy}} to the first one.

The following are also empty:

[..]

Can I delete them?
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, for pointing them out to me. I cleaned up my mess just a second ago. Have an enjoyable day ahead. Lotje (talk) 04:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Looking at the non-empty ones of yours at Commons:Report UncategorizedCategories with infobox, I guess most could be added to Category:People by name. Some seem to have Wikidata items that could be connected. If it helps, I can do you separate listing of those.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 12:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Enhancing999 I gues, for the time being that would be a good way to clean up. Didn't realize there where so many of them in that category. I'd love to see how you do it. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Sure, it's done.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 13:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

BTW, I skipped the ones that didn't appear to be about people. Some 35 should be still left.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 14:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

I was trying to fix Category:Art 19, but wasn't sure. Would you add parent categories? Possibly a more explict category name would be helpful.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Would you also a short description, preferably in English? The parent category itself doesn't really help in this case, plus none of the file descriptions I checked seem to include "Art 19".
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 17:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

I added some categories to Art19. But I think the name should better be changed from 'Art19' to 'Universiteit van Vlaanderen podcasts', this is more clear. --PJ Geest (talk) 07:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I think the category Art19 is better removed if the category Universiteit van Vlaanderen podcasts exists. Since Art 19 is only a publisher of podcasts, not the creator, the category has no value. --PJ Geest (talk) 07:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I changed it to Category:Podcasts hosted by ART19. We do have categories for the sources of files, as such I think it has some value. I would delete Category:Art 19. BTW, I also made Category:ART19.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 07:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Ok, good! I see the category Podcasts hosted by ART19 is in the background, so then it is good for me! --PJ Geest (talk) 08:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

@Enhancing999: @PJ Geest: thank you for sorting this out Much appreciated. Lotje (talk) 11:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Category:Mirza_Riza_Khan

Mirza Riza Khan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Yousiphh (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

File tagging File:Фотогруппа ТРИВА в полном составе перед ее официальным закрытием. 20.12.1981. Автор неизвестен. Из семейного архива В. Соколаева (cropped).tif

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Фотогруппа ТРИВА в полном составе перед ее официальным закрытием. 20.12.1981. Автор неизвестен. Из семейного архива В. Соколаева (cropped).tif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Фотогруппа ТРИВА в полном составе перед ее официальным закрытием. 20.12.1981. Автор неизвестен. Из семейного архива В. Соколаева (cropped).tif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Quick1984 (talk) 11:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)