Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 08:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 06:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
- Info 101 year old Högalidskyrkan in winter. No FP of this church in Stockholm. All by ThibautRe -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ThibautRe (talk) 06:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2024 at 01:50:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
- Info Sleepy male mandarin duck (Aix galericulata) in eclipse plumage (outside of breeding season). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 21:40:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 15:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
- Info Gschnitzer Tribulaun and Goldkappl seen from the Pflerscher Scharte, Stubai Alps, Tyrol, border Austria/Italy. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light and composition, interesting mountains. Yann (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Yann, well depicted, interesting point of view. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 11:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info Lantern in Prelate's courtyard of former Gaming Charterhouse, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but several things serve to ruin this one for me: the modern lightbulb in contrast to the older lamp and wall; the difference in the shadow vs. the lamp; the crack in the lamp glass... I'm just not feeling it.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the prominent shadows works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it too. --BigDom (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yep. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the shadow makes it. Have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the Lighting devices section where most similar FPs are collected. – Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, that fits perfectly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 10:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Chromatic abberations everywhere... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical it doesn't meet the FP standards. Motf is not that breathtaking.--Milseburg (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The colors are gorgeous but the picture is quite noisy and a bit soft. Sorry. -- ThibautRe (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's like starring into a wall; nothing exciting about that. Wolverine XI 20:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2024 at 09:03:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#France
- Info Pont Napoléon that spans a canalised section of Middle River Deûle
All by Pierre André -- Pierre André (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC) - Abstain As author.-- Pierre André (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special here. It lacks sharpness and I find this one better File:Lille pont napoleon.jpg. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Motif is interesting, but light is dull and technic is below the FP bar. --Milseburg (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your advice. --Pierre André (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 13:56:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
- Info created by Roger Kastel, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann
- Support Iconic film poster. Due to copyright, very few documents from this period. -- Yann (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support the movie is free too? --Wilfredor (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Nope. You need to pay some cash. Wolverine XI 20:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Exemplary movie poster for its era. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 12:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main altar and tabernacle of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Kudos to the responsible people for the tasteful lighting; kudos to Poco for the excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:42:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
- Info Stained glass dome in the Royal Portuguese Cabinet of Reading, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 10:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality and interesting perspective. BigDom (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A stunning place. The author wanted to show the beautiful galleries with their innummerable books, the chandelier, and the glass dome — all in a single photo. This is much and has led to an unusal, somewhat forced perspective which unavoidably causes significant distortions; personally I may have preferred separate photos of the various elements; but I must also admit that the result is exciting and impressive, and the difficult contrast between very dark and very bright elements has been handled successfully, so IMHO the photo deserves the star. Wilfredor has carefully reduced the noise and improved the sharpness, thanks for that. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Wilfredor (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 10:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Pycnonotidae (Bulbuls)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support sharp photo, evenly exposed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 11:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support High-quality bird image. Wolverine XI 20:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Also very nice composition, reminds me of the beautiful painted illustrations in some old biology books. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A simple photo, but the colors and the atmosphere make this photo special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, too simple in terms of subject, lighting, compo, I don't believe this is one of our finest shots, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 07:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Refurbished clocktower VS unrefurbished buildings: I like this contrast. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 07:01:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This photo deserves a little love. Yes, at the first glance the lateral view of the façade appears unusual and somewhat irritating. But (a) sometimes a little irritation is good, it shakes us out of our well-meaning lethargy and makes us look closer; (b) the lateral view reveals parts of the domes of the church which are shining in the sunlight; (c) this way we get a beautiful contrast between the shady, bluish piazza and the warm light on the domes. All in all I learn much about the location and the beauty of the church from this photo, much more than from the usual symmetric frontal view, and therefore the photo is IMHO successful and deserves the star. – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2024 at 04:16:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Verbenaceae
- Info Seed formation of a Verbena hastata. Focus stack of 50 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support One important task of photography is to show people that some things they see everyday without really looking at them can be very interesting and beautiful; your plant photos are excellent examples for that task. – Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 22:53:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Procyonidae_(Raccoons_and_Allies)
- Info There are currently no FPs of the genus Nasua. Created, uploaded and nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice posture, excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 07:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas cute subject. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 21:37:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
- Info Warsaw Presidential Palace, with the statue of Jozef Poniatowski in front. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support verticals need fix, see the windows in the right side --Wilfredor (talk) 21:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Will fix shortly. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded — Rhododendrites talk | 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Excellent! Wilfredor (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Stitching prpblems in the roof, see note. Not sure about CAs. Motif is great. --Milseburg (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh nooo. Ok thanks for the note; I'll fix tomorrow. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 21:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Muridae (Murids)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would have liked to see him sniffing a flower or dancing, but I'm happy to see him meditating. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 10:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support With a poetic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support As Aristeas said. There is an ethereal quality to this image with soft foreground and background elements creating something of a bokeh vignette. Meanwhile, the subject is in good lighting with sharp detail. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 16:38:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
- Info Art on Nubian house, Nagaa Suhayl Gharb, Egypt. My shot. Previous was on right side. -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support For a moment I thought it was the Virgin of Guadalupe --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nubians are of Islam religion. Saw 2 mosques near, will try edit some in future. Nubians are very friendly, one invited me to coffee at his house. Very nice interior, like museum. --Mile (talk) 07:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Coffee is that coffee that is heated with sand? I hope you also enjoyed the cult Wilfredor (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool variant of pop art with traditional elements and refreshing subject. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 15:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent sharpnes --Wilfredor (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness is fine but the setup, environment with humanmade elements spoils it to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Would prefer a natural environment, too, but we live in a world dominated by human beings, so IMHO it’s just realistic that even nature photos show human artefacts, too. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 14:56:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by SVKMBFLY - uploaded by SVKMBFLY - nominated by SVKMBFLY -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SVKMBFLY (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting background, I'm afraid that the third butterfly spoils it Poco a poco (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 12:42:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Toys
- Info Matryoshka from Hungary. Created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Withdrawn without a justification. -- ★ 12:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clear image of the nesting dolls, good overall focus, well lite, no distractions. Well composed and executed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 12:41:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support True photomodel this yellow. --Mile (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support This image looks like it was taken in a light box. Even lighting, the subject is in good focus, you can see the texture on the wings. Beautiful bokeh. Wonderfully composed and captured. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful photo for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 03:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 07:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely beautiful. It’s a pity that the masking of the background is a bit rough in some places; see e.g. at the stem of the flower and between its filaments; improving the mask would make the photo perfect. – Aristeas (talk) 09:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --
Chama lazarus (Lazarus jewel box)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 11:49:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Chamidae
- Info The representatives of the genus Chama live with their left valve firmly cemented to a hard surface. This adhesion point can be clearly seen on the left valve; it differs in the absence of typical shell structures such as spines or lamellae; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 11:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support! --Terragio67 (talk) 07:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2024 at 10:30:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose An impressive tree, but unfortunaltely a bad crop and not very sharp --Llez (talk) 11:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Llez: the crop is particularly unfortunate, and the resolution is too low. It's a pity, because the subject is very well presented. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 22:53:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info created by Tydmiz - uploaded by Tydmiz - nominated by Tydmiz -- Tydmiz (talk) 22:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tydmiz (talk) 22:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment categorize the nomination please Ezarateesteban
- Comment Because Tydmiz is new to this page (welcome to the FPC page, Tydmiz!), I have added the gallery link as a little help. – Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 15:46:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is FP for sure, but there is something in the photo processing that generates a low quality photo, the details have been lost, I don't know if it is the automatic development of the camera to JPG but there is a combination of low export quality --Wilfredor (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Easy there big fella; we all see you and your apricots ;). Wolverine XI 21:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't get for that square, before. I think you could use a little bit less sharpening; all horn of buffalo and some halo-especially on bottom (stomach/grass border). --Mile (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting. The wear on the horns, the bald spots on the flanks, the cloudy left eye. Your image tells a story in addition to its aesthetic high value. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect hooks for towels, these horns :-) Nice beast in his natural environment. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 08:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia
- Info Panoramic view from Ulrichsberg in SSE direction to the Karawanks and the Klagenfurt Basin, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and high-quality panorama, very educative. I love how the clouds appear nicely draped over the mountains. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Milseburg (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 06:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2024 at 05:49:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info This sailing boat is a transport lugger that is part of the floating section of the Maritime Museum of Cesenatico. Built in 1936 by the Rondolini shipyard of Cattolica, it is twentyone meters long and seven meters wide, it could carry one hundred and forty tons of goods. The advent of motor boats in the 1930s-40s led to the disappearance of the transport lugger as a merchant vessel. Nowadays, it can be visited by making a reservation at the Museum which is located 20 meters from the boat. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice — Rhododendrites talk | 21:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good focus and depth of field, well exposed, great refelection. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2024 at 14:41:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Ceiling of the Căpriana monastery, Căpriana, Moldova. The Eastern Orthodoxy monastery, one of the oldest in the country, was founded in 1429. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think you overdose with light/saturation, i am used to their dark ambience. 2nd option was better. --Mile (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mile: Ok, fair, I've pushed it back a bit Poco a poco (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I didnt suppose you will move back. I support. Monastery is a bit different than church, i was there before. --Mile (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool --Terragio67 (talk) 21:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm surprised that there're no FPs from Moldova (regardless the last one of the same photographer). ★ 21:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I guess it is not the most popular destination for holidays, I had a good time, though. Poco a poco (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Rich detail --Tagooty (talk) 01:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 07:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful! What a picture this is! Wolverine XI 21:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Gnosis (talk) 20:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2024 at 05:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info A young man smoking a cigarette, a serene elderly man on a bicycle, an architecture enthusiast who photographs the Masini fountain sitted in Piazza del Popolo (Cesena) - Italy. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The framing arch nicely emphasizes some of the most beautiful parts of that square, and the few people add some life to the scene without diverting from the fountain and buildings. – Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tried some edits, to crop above till that metal stick. But made decision up to that well dressed photographer at the kafetaria and cycler, which bring much to photo. --Mile (talk) 16:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 22:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Raimundo Madrazo - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:08, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like at least one error added in the restoration process. Added a note. In a couple other places it looks like a mark may have been modified rather than removed. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Rhododendrites: fixed the annotation you did and anothers I found, thanks!!! Ezarateesteban
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 20:22:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, the second bird isn't sharp and not in focus Ezarateesteban 22:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree – worst case be the second bird can be cropped. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Some px on both side would be helpfull, especially on right side since that bird is in focus. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Agree with Mile. And definitely don't crop -- the photo is about a confrontation. Regarding sharpness of the egret, it is in a middle-ground area where it would be better for it to be blurrier or sharper, but I enjoy the drama of the heron's pose. All-in-all that brings me to neutral. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 12:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The main subject is the heron so I have no problem with the egret beeing out of focus. Also I think that the egret adds to the scene because it's looking at the heron -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice focus control. ★ 01:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 14:42:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Crassulaceae
- Info A focus-stacked close-up of an Echeveria succulent, the image is about 3.5 cm × 2.5 cm (1.38 in × 0.98 in) in size. There is only 1 FP of this genus and none at this magnification. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice color balance. Image captures the texture of the Echeveria and the tooth-like structures could provide inspiration for a sequel to little shop of horrors. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 22:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 20:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 14:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
- Info created by Emptywords - uploaded by Emptywords - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 00:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's undoubtedly a useful pic, but no FP for me. Because of chromatic aberrations and perspective distortion I would not even promote it as QI. And overall the composition seems a bit unbalanced, with the harsh shadow at the right, the scaffold-like structure at the bottom. Sorry --A.Savin 06:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per A.Savin --Tagooty (talk) 01:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per A.Savin --Milseburg (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2024 at 00:27:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 00:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light! ★ 21:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose good image, but not sufficiantly special. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 15:17:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This makes me miss SE Asia. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The big featureless bank of clouds spoils the composition for me. --Tagooty (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral for me the photo is messy. There is a bit of everything, an old settlement, a fence, sad clouds, a mountain and gray water. Depressing for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Light and colours are rather muted, but I like how the clouds at the top hide the upper part of the mountains and correspond to the water in the foreground. – Aristeas (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I understand the idea of capturing the entire landscape along with the lake and the mountains, very beautifull, however, dull colors, lack of light, the area where the dog and the chickens are looks blurry or out of focus. I think there is too much lake, the composition would have been better if it was centered on the house with the animals and only a small portion of the river. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Very atmospheric photo. I like it. However, the composition would be much stronger if half of the boring cloud on top was cut off. Anyway, i Support. -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2024 at 08:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1950-1959
- Info created by Associated Press, uploaded by Lemonreader, nominated by Yann
- Support Iconic picture, FP on English WP. -- Yann (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Haven't I seen this before? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolverine XI (talk • contribs) 14:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC) (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Is the most recent version really any higher resolution? It looks like it may have just had the size increased digitally? — Rhododendrites talk | 12:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- It was scrutinized and promoted on English WP, so it think it is OK. Lemonreader has not edited here since 2022, but I will let a message on enwiki. Yann (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
OpposeI would love original to stay, one person went missing here. At least. But his shoes are there :==== --Mile (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. Yann (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: see square --Mile (talk) 16:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Would it be OK if the shoe is removed? Yann (talk) 16:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: Not sure, I would like to keep original. Its iconic image. --Mile (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Yes, but the man doesn't bring anything. In fact, seeing that he is very dark and more than half hidden, removing him entirely makes sense. So I removed the shoe, and the disturbing light, at the upper right. Yann (talk) 19:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support OK, i didnt know i vote on English, but yes. I striked at least, but i still try to see original as original, and then lets make own copy and edit. For old film shots. --Mile (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC) p.S. And how is possible not to know author of such image ?
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I completely understand the urge to remove the cropped shoe and lamp (and I would do so if this was my own photo), but this is a historic(al) and even iconic photo, therefore I think we should not make any substantial edits to it and I must oppose the edited version. – Aristeas (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2024 at 02:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Laos
- Info The warm frames on the wall create an interesting impact with the light through the rectangular door, in my opinion. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo is technically good but I don't see anything special to make it FP El Golli Mohamed 16:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- 💡 Lights? -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The light is very good. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per El Golli Mohamed. -- Karelj (talk) 08:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo is visually pleasing, but upon closer inspection, I can't find any element that breaks the feeling of looking at a carefully crafted scene for a hotel advertisement. The atmosphere, though aesthetically perfect, seems almost too flawless, leaving me with the impression that everything has been arranged to sell --Wilfredor (talk) 23:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info 100% free entrance (and welcoming team) -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 18:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, it lacks something special that makes it extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2024 at 22:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Nyctanassa
- Info A juvenile yellow-crowned night heron at the Plumb Beach saltmarsh. Panorama (it stood still, so it seemed like a good opportunity to include context without sacrificing detail). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 22:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good with DOF and some creativity with pano and same focal. Bird is sharp. --Mile (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Mile --Terragio67 (talk) 20:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good photo of the bird in its habitat; I like the harmonious blue/yellow/brownish colours. – Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Way too far, unappealing centered composition, dull light. The image is 8469 × 6355, why not crop it to a more interesting view? --Kadellar (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- If you look at my recent uploads, I uploaded several of this bird without all the space. But we so rarely get context/habitat in the photos we promote because, in part, we're concerned with subject detail. So here is a panorama to show subject detail *and* extra space to show habitat. Whether that's appealing to enough people, we'll see, but that's the idea. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The idea of providing context is good, but this image does not do it in an exceptional way. DoF is too small, the blurred areas dominate the view. --Tagooty (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sun 08 Sep → Fri 13 Sep Mon 09 Sep → Sat 14 Sep Tue 10 Sep → Sun 15 Sep Wed 11 Sep → Mon 16 Sep Thu 12 Sep → Tue 17 Sep Fri 13 Sep → Wed 18 Sep
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Wed 04 Sep → Fri 13 Sep Thu 05 Sep → Sat 14 Sep Fri 06 Sep → Sun 15 Sep Sat 07 Sep → Mon 16 Sep Sun 08 Sep → Tue 17 Sep Mon 09 Sep → Wed 18 Sep Tue 10 Sep → Thu 19 Sep Wed 11 Sep → Fri 20 Sep Thu 12 Sep → Sat 21 Sep Fri 13 Sep → Sun 22 Sep
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.